Inside the MAGA Mind

The Psychology of Trump’s Authoritarian Followers

The Ritual of a Strongman’s Downfall

There is a certain ritual to the downfall of a strongman. The moment of reckoning arrives, statues are torn down, memoirs of his inner circle leak out, and suddenly, the faithful begin their retreat. They claim they did not know. They insist they were lied to. They say they were just trying to save their country.

History has seen this pattern before in post-Nazi Germany, Pinochet’s Chile, Franco’s Spain, Berlusconi’s Italy, and now, in real time, Trump’s America. The excuse is always the same. They were misled and betrayed by the very leader they had sworn to defend. But the truth is undeniable. They were warned every step of the way.

They knew. They just did not care.

Donald Trump’s rise, and the unsettling resilience of his support through two impeachments, 91 criminal indictments, and an attempted coup, is not a mystery. It is not an accident. It is not a fluke. It is a psychological inevitability, a textbook case of authoritarian followership driven by predictable and well-documented traits.

They are not victims of deception. They are participants in it. The most terrifying part is that they are incapable of seeing what they have become.

The Attraction to Authoritarianism

In 2016, Donald Trump did not simply win the presidency. He revealed something that had long existed in American politics—a deep attraction to authoritarian leadership among a sizable portion of the electorate. His candidacy was not an ordinary Republican campaign. It was a movement built on grievance, a crusade against so-called elites, and an outright rejection of the norms of liberal democracy.

His most ardent supporters displayed a loyalty that defied logic, evidence, and even their own self-interest. But why?

Decades of psychological research provide a compelling explanation. The phenomenon of Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) accounts for much of the MAGA movement’s unwavering devotion. From Bob Altemeyer’s groundbreaking work on authoritarian followers to studies demonstrating the emboldening effects of Trump’s rhetoric, the evidence is overwhelming.

Trump’s base is not simply unaware of what research shows about his presidency and the consequences of his policies. Many are willfully resistant to facts, their worldview shaped by years of cognitive conditioning.

The Authoritarian Personality: Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation

Robert Altemeyer’s research on authoritarianism describes two distinct but interrelated psychological profiles: right-wing authoritarians and social dominators. Trump supporters score high in both categories.

Right-wing authoritarians exhibit unwavering submission to authority figures they perceive as legitimate, aggressive hostility toward outsiders, and strict adherence to social conventions (Altemeyer, 1998). Social Dominance Orientation, meanwhile, reflects a belief in hierarchical social structures and a preference for inequality (Jost et al., 2003). Trump himself exemplifies social dominance, thriving on division and the implicit promise to restore a perceived lost status to his supporters.

The connection between these traits and Trump’s base is evident. Authoritarian voters seek strong leaders who will enforce order, even at the cost of democracy itself (Dean & Altemeyer, 2020). The infamous Access Hollywood tape, the 91 criminal charges, the blatant lies—none of it mattered to them. Many of his supporters even reveled in his crudeness, seeing it as proof that he was tough and unbound by the rules imposed by the so-called establishment.

Why Authoritarians Follow Strongmen

Trump’s support base largely consists of individuals who feel threatened—economically, culturally, and socially. Research shows that authoritarian followers are especially reactive to perceived threats and are drawn to leaders who promise a return to a mythologized past (Hetherington & Weiler, 2009).

The slogan "Make America Great Again" was not accidental. It appealed directly to those who felt displaced by social progress.

Studies have shown that Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric emboldened prejudiced individuals, making them more likely to express and act on their biases (Newman et al., 2020). This is a hallmark of authoritarian leaders. They do not create prejudice, but they give their followers permission to express it. Trump’s repeated attacks on immigrants, Muslims, and Black Lives Matter protesters were not simply political strategies. They were signals to his base that their anxieties were justified.

The Backfire Effect: Why Facts Do Not Matter

One of the most striking findings in political psychology is the "backfire effect." Studies have demonstrated that when individuals with strong ideological commitments are confronted with evidence contradicting their beliefs, they often become even more entrenched (Nyhan & Reifler, 2010).

Trump’s base is a textbook example of this phenomenon. No amount of factual correction, investigative reporting, or exposés of his corruption could shake their devotion.

This is not mere ignorance. Trump supporters are not simply uninformed. They are misinformed, and their worldview is designed to protect itself against inconvenient truths. This is why fact-checking Trump’s lies has had little effect. The perception of Trump as a victim of media bias and political persecution feeds into the authoritarian need for a strongman who stands against the corrupt elite (Kelly, 2020).

The Subtle Art of Discrimination: "I’m Not Racist, But…"

Much of Trump’s base operates under a veil of plausible deniability. They do not see themselves as racist, but they believe minorities should "work harder." They are not xenophobic, but they think "we need law and order."

The psychological mechanism at play here is what Jost et al. (2003) called "system justification"—the unconscious tendency to rationalize and defend existing social hierarchies.

Studies show that Trump’s presidency led to an increase in expressed prejudice among his supporters. This was not necessarily because they became more racist, but because they felt freer to say what they had always believed (Ruisch & Brandt, 2021). Trumpism did not convert people to bigotry. It simply made bigotry acceptable again.

Conclusion: A Cult of Personality or a Permanent Fixture?

The question remains. Are Trump’s supporters blind, or do they see everything perfectly well and simply not care? The research suggests a mixture of both. Many MAGA voters are not ignorant of Trump’s flaws. They revel in them.

His lies, his attacks on institutions, and his reckless disregard for the truth are not seen as faults. They are seen as strengths. His base does not want a president in the traditional sense. They want a warrior against modernity, against change, and against the liberalization of America.

Trump’s authoritarian appeal will not vanish even if he does. The psychological profile of the MAGA voter—authoritarianism, social dominance, the backfire effect, and system justification—will persist.

The challenge for American democracy is not just to defeat Trump. It is to understand why so many people need him in the first place.

---

References

• Altemeyer, B. (1998). The Other "Authoritarian Personality".

• Dean, J. W., & Altemeyer, B. (2020). Authoritarian Nightmare: Trump and His Followers.

• Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics.

• Jost, J. T., et al. (2003). Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.

• Kelly, C. R. (2020). Donald J. Trump and the Rhetoric of Ressentiment.

• Newman, B., et al. (2020). The Trump Effect: An Experimental Investigation of Racially Inflammatory Elite Communication.

• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.

• Ruisch, B. C., & Brandt, M. J. (2021). Changes in Americans’ Prejudices During the Trump Presidency